Dendrite-free Zn anodes enabled by interface engineering for non-alkaline Zn-air and Zn-ion batteries
0Abstract
Aqueous zinc-metal batteries hold immense promise for large-scale energy storage applications due to their cost-effectiveness and superior safety features. However, uncontrolled dendrite growth, corrosion and side reactions in aqueous environments destabilize the electrode/electrolyte, leading to Zn plating/striping irreversibility. Herein, a low-cost, non-toxic functional electrolyte additive, tetraethyl ammonium bromide (TEAB), addresses this challenge. The preferential adsorption of TEAB on the surface of the Zn anode endows the Zn/electrolyte interface with an optimized electric field distribution and abundant active sites for the uniform and dendrite-free Zn2+ deposition. Moreover, TEAB disrupts the H-bond network between the electrolytes, effectively suppressing water-induced side reactions and corrosion. Consequently, a Zn||Zn symmetric battery achieves a long cycle life of
Keywords
INTRODUCTION
In recent years, the design of cost-effective, environmentally friendly, and reusable secondary batteries has emerged as an ideal solution for electrochemical energy storage devices (EESDs) across various industries[1-3]. Ever since their commercialization, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have become the preeminent energy storage technology in electric vehicles, portable electronic devices, and various other energy advancement domains[4,5]. However, obstacles to their construction automation primarily stem from challenges, including the scarcity of lithium resources, safety concerns linked to flammable organic electrolytes, and the significant costs involved[6-9]. Consequently, alternative metal-based EESDs, including Zn, Na, Ca, Al and K, have gained increasing attention. Among these options, zinc-based EESDs, such as zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) and zinc-air batteries (ZABs), hold significant potential in energy storage[10]. Zinc, serving as a plentiful and easily obtainable anode material, offers a high theoretical volume capacity density (5,585 mAh cm-2), low redox potential [E (Zn/Zn2+) = 0.76 V vs. the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE)], environmental friendliness, low-cost, and wide applicability[5,11,12]. Furthermore, due to its inherently safe aqueous inorganic electrolyte composition, zinc-based EESDs display simplified battery manufacturing processes with reduced environmental pollution and costs and high ionic conductivity (> 10 mS cm-1)[13].
Nevertheless, the uncontrolled growth and parasitic reaction of zinc dendrites pose a significant challenge for zinc anodes in zinc-metal batteries (ZMBs), severely limiting their practical application[14-16]. Among various strategies explored so far, optimizing aqueous electrolytes by incorporating additives has emerged as one of the most cost-effective and feasible solutions to address these issues[17,18]. The primary objective behind this strategy is to enhance the electrochemical environment. Meanwhile, beneficial elements are deposited or adsorbed on the Zn electrode, which promotes uniform electric field, improves the deposition morphology of Zn2+, inhibits corrosion, and prevents passivation[19-21]. However, identifying an additive that can simultaneously cater to the requirements of both aqueous ZIBs (AZIBs) and ZABs remains a formidable task.
Highly concentrated alkaline electrolytes (6-7 M KOH) were widely studied for ZABs, while few researches focused on weak acidic and neutral electrolytes[22-24]. Zn anodes in alkaline electrolytes are prone to the dendrite formation, alkali-inert by-product generation, and continuous corrosion during charge and discharge, leading to obvious passivation on the anode surface[25,26]. Excessively using anodes and electrolytes to improve battery performance is not only material waste but also underutilizes battery capacity. Moreover, overabundant alkaline electrolytes tend to degrade during operation and readily react with CO2 in the atmosphere, reducing electrical conductivity[27]. Employing a pure O2 environment as a solution to cathode introduces additional costs and complicates the system, thereby diminishing its commercial viability. To address this issue, most AZIBs apply neutral or slightly acidic baseline electrolytes such as zinc sulfate (ZnSO4), zinc chloride (ZnCl2), Trifluoromethanesulfonic acid zinc salt [Zn(TfO)2], and zinc acetate [Zn(CH3CO2)2][24,25]. By combining these baseline electrolytes with various low concentration additives, distinct inhibitory effects on the dendrite formation and side reactions can be achieved, significantly enhancing cycle stability. Inspired by this, incorporating neutral or slightly acidic electrolytes into ZABs presents a promising avenue[2,19]. Non-alkaline electrolytes offer many advantages and hold great research significance. Firstly, they generally exhibit high reversibility for the Zn deposition. Secondly, the electrolyte remains unreactive towards CO2, ensuring battery stability in the air environment. However, exposing the electrode to the aqueous solution environment still results in numerous side reactions, necessitating the introduction of appropriate additives to enhance the electrolyte properties[28,29].
Quaternary ammonium organic surfactant additives significantly inhibit dendrite and by-product formation and corrosion in AZIBs and alkaline ZABs. Trace amounts of tetrabutylammonium sulfate (TBA2SO4)[20], tetraethylammonium chloride (TEAC)[19], and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)[30] introduced into AZIBs as multifunctional additives can reduce the activity of H2O, adsorb onto the Zn anode surface to optimize Zn deposition direction, and inhibit by-products. Adding methyl ammonium bromide and tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB) to alkaline ZAB electrolytes can effectively suppress the formation of ZnO and dendrite growth[31]. The method of introducing additives into non-alkaline electrolytes is rarely observed. Herein, we have developed a non-toxic, low-cost, non-alkaline electrolyte additive strategy for AZIBs and ZABs. By introducing tetraethyl ammonium bromide (TEAB), the H bond network in the electrolyte can be disrupted; interfacial wettability of Zn anodes is improved, and solvation sheath structure of Zn2+ is altered. TEAB effectively suppresses dendrite growth and improves the battery reversibility. The Zn||Zn battery exhibits an exceptional cyclic stability of 4,950 h at 1 mA cm-2-1 mAh cm-2. The Zn||MnO2 battery demonstrates an impressive lifespan exceeding 2,000 cycles at 3 A g-1. Furthermore, the Zn||air battery achieves a reversible capacity of 616 mAh gZn-1 and can undergo cycling for up to 270 h.
EXPERIMENTAL
Preparation of electrolyte
To establish a baseline electrolyte, zinc sulfate (ZnSO4·7H2O, Aladdin, purity of 99%) was dissolved in deionized water (DI water) to obtain a 1 M ZnSO4 solution. Subsequently, TEAB (Aladdin, purity of 99%) was added at varying concentrations to form TEAB-containing electrolytes. All ingredients were placed in sealed bottles and sonicated for 2 h to become uniform and clear.
Cathode preparation
The synthesis of δ-MnO2 was accomplished using a straightforward redox reaction. Initially, 1.48 g KCl and 0.632 g KMnO4 were combined with 100 mL of DI water. This mixture was stirred for 10 min. Subsequently, the mixed solution was transferred to a water bath maintained at 60 °C. Additionally, 1.014 g MnSO4 was introduced and allowed to react at 60 °C for 60 min. The reaction products were filtered three times in DI water and subsequently dried for 12 h at 70 °C in a vacuum oven. For the fabrication of the δ-MnO2 cathode, δ-MnO2, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), and Ketjen black were mixed in a ratio of 7:1:2, using N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) as the solvent. The prepared slurry was spread onto carbon cloth, intended for use as cathode materials in AZIBs. This cathode material was then dried in an oven for 12 h. The loading distribution was about 1.5 mg cm-2.
Electrochemical measurements
Zn||Zn, Zn||Cu, Zn||Mo, and Zn||MnO2 were assembled under ambient conditions. The dimensions of all metal electrodes are 10 mm × 10 mm. The Zn foil has a thickness of 200 μm, and the Cu and Mo foils are each 100 μm thick. Glass fiber (GF/A) served as the separator for all cells. The baseline electrolytes employed were 1 M ZnSO4 for the symmetric and half cells, 1 M ZnSO4 supplemented with 0.1 M MnSO4 for the full cells, and the electrolyte volume was 80 μL. The Zn||air cell used the MnO2/C air electrode as the cathode and the Zn foil (30 mm × 20 mm) as the anode, which was assembled and tested under ambient air conditions at room temperature. The battery was charged and discharged with a LAND battery tester. Additionally, a CHI660E electrochemical station was employed to test electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), linear sweep voltammetry (LSV), polarization (Tafel), Chronoamperometry (CA), and cyclic voltammetry (CV).
SS||SS symmetric batteries were assembled and tested through the impedance method to explore the conductivity of electrolytes. The ionic conductivity is determined by:
where σ denotes the ionic conductivity, L represents the thickness of the electrolyte layer, R signifies the resistance, and A corresponds to the contact area of the electrode.
Material characterizations
Crystallographic data of the samples were acquired at a scanning rate of 10° min-1 using a Bruker D8 Advance X-Ray Diffractometer. To investigate the surface structure of the samples, a Hitachi SU-8010 scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used. Prior to SEM measurements, the samples were coated with gold under a nitrogen (N2) atmosphere. Surface compositions were evaluated using ESCALAB Mk X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Additionally, the Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrum was obtained using the Spectrum 100. The Raman spectrum was obtained using the Jobin Yvon HORIBA instrument with a laser wavelength of 633 nanometers. The SL250 Contact Angle Measuring System was leveraged to evaluate the contact angles.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
We consistently adhere to the principle of conducting low-cost and environmentally friendly research in experiments. We select 1 M ZnSO4 as the baseline electrolyte, designated as ZSO, and subsequently incorporated TEAB as an electrolyte additive at concentrations of 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 M, denoted as
To demonstrate the capability of TEAB in reducing H2O molecule activity and inhibiting side reactions, FT-IR spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) identified various functional groups present in the electrolyte. Figure 1A and B illustrates the detection of the tensile vibration of O-H within the range of 3,000-3,700 cm-1. The blue shift of ν(O-H) peak with the increasing TEAB concentrations (0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 M) indicates the enhanced bonding ability of O-H groups. This increase in O-H bond energy facilitates disruption of H-bond network between H2O molecules and significantly suppresses side reactions. The enhanced interaction between TEAB and H2O molecules reduces the activity of H2O molecules. Besides, the peaks at 2,956 and 3,002 cm-1 observed in the Raman spectrum of TEAB electrolyte are ascribed to the vibrational modes of C-H bonds, exhibiting enhanced intensities with increasing additive concentration[30,32]. As seen in Figure 1C, pure ZSO electrolyte displays a characteristic peak at 982 cm-1, which corresponds to ν(SO42-) mainly arising from formation of the contact ion pair (Zn2+-OSO32-). In the mixed solution containing both TEAB and ZSO, additional solvent-specific peaks at 667, 897, 1,069 and 1,120 cm-1 are detected, suggesting alterations in the coordination between solvents and the chemical environment of the electrolyte[33]. The disruption of solvation structure and the H-bonds network are supported by the 1H NMR spectra [Figure 1D]. A shift to downfield is observed upon adding ZSO and TEAB, indicating the decreased electron cloud density of H2O on 1H and, therefore, the reduced H-bonds interactions between H2O molecules. The addition of TEAB disrupts the H-bonds network between H2O and simultaneously optimizes the electrolyte environment to inhibit side reactions.
Figure 1. (A) FT-IR and (B and C) Raman spectra in ZSO electrolytes with and without different concentrations of TEAB additives. (D)
The wetting behavior of the electrode/electrolyte interface was assessed through a contact angle test
After plating/stripping in the pure ZSO electrolyte, the electrode surface, as observed in Figure 1J, is rather rough with many coarse Zn dendrites and by-products. Regrettably, even Zn particles with tens of microns are sufficient to puncture the separator. In sharp contrast, introducing TEAB additives enhances the electrode surface flatness and inhibits side reactions [Figure 1K-N]. It is noteworthy that Zn electrodes deposited in 0.01 and 0.2 M TEAB electrolytes still exhibit numerous loose fine Zn particles and a few by-products, whereas smooth and compact deposits are observed in 0.05 and 0.1 M TEAB electrolytes. Insufficient or excessive TEAB additives result in uneven deposition layers and ineffective inhibition of dendrite formation and by-product generation. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) results are presented in Figure 1O. In addition to Zn diffraction peaks, other crystalline phases corresponding to
Ionic conductivity is an important index of the ion transport ability in the electrolyte, which can be determined from the impedance value of a stainless-steel symmetric cell (SS||SS) containing various electrolytes [Figure 1P]. Compared to pure ZSO electrolyte (92.08 mS cm-1), slight decreases in the ionic conductivity are observed with values of 82.03, 76.04, and 74.37 mS cm-1, respectively, with 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 M TEAB additives [Figure 1Q]. However, the conductivity drops to 49.76 mS cm-1 with 0.2 M TEAB. The CV and EIS curves are examined to further elucidate the impact of TEAB additives on conductivity
Zn||Zn cells were subjected to electrochemical performance tests at various current densities and fixed area capacities to investigate the cycling stability of Zn anodes with and without TEAB additives. As depicted in Figure 2A, at 1 mA cm-2-1 mAh cm-2, the overpotentials of different Zn||Zn cells remain below 100 mV. Pure ZSO electrolytes only provide a cycle life of 87 h after which short circuits occur due to excessive dendrite growth and frequent side reactions. Remarkably, it is worth noting that the Zn||Zn symmetric cell exhibits stable cycling up to 4,950 h in the presence of 0.1 M TEAB electrolyte, approximately 57 times longer than that with pure ZSO electrolytes. TEAB preferentially adsorbs onto the anode surface to provide more active sites for the Zn2+ deposition, promoting the formation of tiny Zn nuclei and, therefore, decreasing the dendrite and by-product formation. At a high current density of 5 mA cm-2, the symmetric cell with TEAB additives exhibits a long cycle life of 2,950 h [Figure 2B]. According to the nucleation and growth theory, increasing current density allows for the formation of small and dense Zn nuclei[20]. Even under harsh conditions with increased capacities of 5 mA cm-2, 5 mAh cm-2 and 10 mA cm-2, 10 mAh cm-2, symmetric cells in the presence of TEAB additives demonstrate rather stable cycle reversibility, reaching up to 750 and 500 h, respectively [Supplementary Figure 5 and Figure 2C]. The high-rate performance results are presented in Figure 2D and Supplementary Figure 6. Zn||Zn cells in 0.1 M TEAB exhibit excellent cyclic stability within the current density ranging from 1 to 30 mA cm-2 under a constant area capacity of
Figure 2. Cycling performance of Zn||Zn cells in ZSO electrolytes with and without 0.1 M TEAB additive under (A) 1 mA cm-2 and
Under reversible Zn cycles of 5 mA cm-2 and 0.5 mAh cm-2, the coulombic efficiency (CE) was determined by asymmetric Zn||Cu cells. The cell fails after fewer than 350 cycles in pure ZSO electrolytes. However, with TEAB additives, the average CE of the Zn||Cu cell reaches an impressive 99.5% even after 1,000 cycles [Figure 2E]. This could be well explained that the presence of TEAB can promote homogeneous Zn2+ deposition while effectively inhibiting dendrite growth and parasitic reactions. Furthermore, including TEAB additives results in an initial overpotential of 284.5 mV compared to 169.6 mV observed in the pure ZSO electrolyte [Figure 2F], which is consistent with the ionic conductivity analysis. The nucleation and growth of Zn on the Cu surface is hindered, which facilitates the finely crystalline nuclei formation. These nuclei are uniformly distributed across the anode surface, substantially reducing the likelihood of Zn dendrite formation and contributing to generating homogeneous Zn deposits. Consequently, both Zn||Zn symmetric cells and Zn||Cu half cells exhibit significantly enhanced cycle life.
The SEM image in Figure 3A and B illustrates the nickel foam galvanized at the constant voltage of 0.1 V. Loose lamellar stacking morphology and petal-like Zn dendrites could be obviously observed in the pure electrolytes, as compared to a compact hexagonal crystal in the presence of TEAB additives. LSV curves of different electrolytes at 10 mV cm-2 are shown in Figure 3C, which can be used to evaluate the electrochemical window and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) of the electrolyte. The electrochemical stability window (ESW) increases by 55 mV with the addition of TEAB additives. In addition, the enhanced HER overpotential while reduced HER current density indicates the successful hinderance of H2O-induced HER with the TEAB additive. Simultaneously, we conducted corrosion stability tests on the electrode surface with various additives. The Tafel polarization curve in Figure 3D reveals that incorporating TEAB elevates the corrosion potential on the Zn electrode surface from -0.997 to -0.985 V. Consequently, the TEAB addition effectively mitigates the corrosion tendency of the Zn electrode and exhibits remarkable anti-corrosion capabilities. The SEM images in Supplementary Figure 9 illustrate the surface morphology of the Zn foils immersed in various electrolytes for a week. Notably, severe corrosion can be observed when exposed to pure ZSO electrolytes, accompanied by the formation of granular basic zinc sulfate by-products. Conversely, no corrosion or by-product formation occurs when using TEAB additives. In addition, CA was conducted at -150 mV to assess the diffusion and deposition mechanism of Zn2+ in different electrolytes [Figure 3E]. The Zn electrode immersed in the pure ZSO electrolyte exhibits a continuously decreasing current density, suggesting a continuous two-dimensional (2D) diffusion. During 2D diffusion, Zn2+ undergoes continuous lateral diffusion along the electrode surface, resulting in rampant dendrite growth under the influence of “tip effect”, which leads to significant disruption of electric field distribution. Adding a small amount of TEAB can significantly mitigate this phenomenon. The preferential adsorption of TEAB creates a transverse energy barrier for the diffusion of Zn2+, and after a brief period (100 s) of 2D diffusion, stable 3D diffusion is observed for the Zn electrode. A higher energy barrier implies stronger driving force that facilitates spreading out to more active sites for deposition by Zn2+, thereby promoting flat deposition layer formation [Figure 3F][34,35]. The EIS plots at different temperatures and Corresponding activation energy values (Ea) are presented in Supplementary Figure 10. The de-solvation process of Zn2+ is investigated by employing the Arrhenius equation (inset of Supplementary Figure 10C) to calculate Ea. It is noteworthy that the Ea value for 0.1 M TEAB (16.7 KJ mol-1) is lower than that of ZSO (24.9 KJ mol-1), confirming that the addition of TEAB could effectively enhance the de-solvation process of Zn2+[36].
Figure 3. (A and B) SEM images of the Ni foam galvanized in ZSO electrolytes with and without 0.1 M TEAB additive at the constant voltage of -0.1 V (vs. Zn/Zn2+) for 0.5 h. (C) LSV of different electrolytes at 10 mA cm-2. (D) Tafel curves at 1 mV s-1. (E) CA curves of different electrolytes at an overpotential of -150 mV. (F) Deposition models of Zn2+ in ZSO electrolytes with and without 0.1 M TEAB additive.
With a view to further elucidate the working mechanism of the TEAB additive, the surface composition of the Zn electrode was analyzed by XPS. Exceptionally strong C signals are observed on the Zn electrode surface with TEAB additives [Figure 4A and B], including C-C, C-H, C-N, C-O, and O-C=O, which arise from the organic cations of TEAB additives. Figure 4C and D clearly demonstrates that the intensity of Zn 2p peaks on the ZSO electrode surface is significantly higher than that observed in the TEAB electrolyte, providing further evidence for the presence of a TEAB adsorption layer on the surface. Furthermore, S 2p spectra show a pair of spin-orbit coupling peaks of sulfate situated at 168.75 and 169.9 eV, corresponding to S 2p1/2 and S 2p3/2. A notable reduction in the S 2p strength with the TEAB additives suggests the successful inhibition of zinc sulfate hydroxide hydrate (ZSH) by-product formation on the Zn electrode surface
Figure 4. XPS spectra of Zn anodes after 15 cycles in ZSO electrolytes with and without 0.1 M TEAB additive: High-resolution XPS spectra of (A and B) C 1s, (C and D) Zn 2p and (E and F) S 2p.
We further assemble Zn||MnO2 full cells to demonstrate the practical application potential of the TEAB additive. Supplementary Figure 11 shows the SEM image patterns of the cathode materials δ-MnO2 obtained via a facile redox method. By comparing the CV curves of both electrolytes, the inclusion of TEAB additives does not induce any additional reactions [Figure 5A][37]. The EIS tests of Zn||MnO2 full cells in ZSO and
Figure 5. Electrochemical performance of Zn||MnO2 full cells and Zn||air cells in ZSO electrolytes with and without 0.1 M TEAB additive: (A) CV curves at 1 mV s-1. Cycling performance of Zn||MnO2 cells at (B) 1 A g-1 and (C) 3 A g-1. (D) CV curves in Zn||air cells at
The effect of the TEAB additives is further evaluated in Zn||air cells, applying air as a cathode in ZSO electrolytes with and without the TEAB additive. The setup is schematically shown in
Figure 5E compares the cycling performance of ZABs at 0.5 mA cm-2 (discharge and charge for 1 h) with different electrolytes. The open-circuit voltages of the cells in both ZSO electrolytes with and without TEAB additives are 1.54 V, close to the one in the alkaline solution. The voltage drops to 0 during discharge in the pure ZSO electrolyte. On the other hand, the ZABs in the presence of TEAB additives can cycle stably for more than 270 h. Adding TEAB additives can improve the dissolution, migration and deposition of Zn2+ in the electrolyte, alleviate the contact between the Zn anode and the electrolyte, and form a surface intermediate to alleviate the anodic corrosion. The comparison of the charging and discharging voltages during cycling in the presence of TEAB additives can be seen in Supplementary Figure 15. The gap voltage is 0.86 V, and energy efficiency reaches 53% at the initial 30 h. The gap voltage is 1.09 V, and energy efficiency only reaches 42% after 100 h. Due to the evaporation of the electrolyte in the air, the actual effective contact area between the active material and the electrolyte is reduced, leading to a higher overpotential later. In addition, ZABs with TEAB additives can achieve a reversible capacity of 616 mAh g-1 [Supplementary Figure 16]. SEM images show that the cycled Zn anode in the pure ZSO electrolyte exhibits a rough surface with many deep pits [Figure 5F]. On the contrary, a lamellar structure is exhibited in the presence of TEAB additives [Figure 5G]. The results suggest that the TEAB additive can effectively mitigate the degradation of the Zn anode surface upon cycling, avoid the drastic change of the Zn anode shape, and, therefore, improve the cycling stability. Meanwhile, as seen in the XRD patterns in
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, we propose using TEAB as a non-toxic and cost-effective electrolyte additive to improve the ZMB durability during cycling. By disrupting the H-bond network in the ZSO electrolyte, TEAB effectively reduces H2O molecule activity and inhibits side reactions such as HER and corrosion in the electrode/electrolyte interface. This results in the Zn||Zn symmetric battery demonstrating outstanding rate capability and maintaining remarkable cycle stability for 4,950 h at 1 mA cm-2 and 1 mAh cm-2. Additionally, the
DECLARATIONS
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Analysis and Test Center, Guangdong University of Technology, for the microscopy and microanalysis of our specimens.
Authors’ contributions
Methodology, investigation, measurement execution, and manuscript writing: Fang T
Investigation reviewing, measurement execution, and data analysis: Wu M
Investigation, methodology, and data analysis: Lu F
Investigation and methodology: Zhou Z
Project administration, supervision, funding acquisition, and editing: Fu Y
Resources, funding acquisition, and supervision: Shi Z
Availability of data and materials
The data supporting our work can be found in the Supplementary Materials.
Financial support and sponsorship
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21905057).
Conflicts of interest
All authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2024.
Supplementary Materials
REFERENCES
1. Blanc LE, Kundu D, Nazar LF. Scientific challenges for the implementation of Zn-ion batteries. Joule 2020;4:771-99.
2. Yang J, Yin B, Sun Y, et al. Zinc anode for mild aqueous zinc-ion batteries: challenges, strategies, and perspectives. Nanomicro Lett 2022;14:42.
3. Wang Y, Wang Z, Yang F, et al. Electrolyte engineering enables high performance zinc-ion batteries. Small 2022;18:e2107033.
4. Xu M, Chen J, Zhang Y, Raza B, Lai C, Wang J. Electrolyte design strategies towards long-term Zn metal anode for rechargeable batteries. J Energy Chem 2022;73:575-87.
5. Li Y, Wang Z, Cai Y, et al. Designing advanced aqueous zinc-ion batteries: principles, strategies, and perspectives. Energy Environ Mater 2022;5:823-51.
6. Zheng Y, Yao Y, Ou J, et al. A review of composite solid-state electrolytes for lithium batteries: fundamentals, key materials and advanced structures. Chem Soc Rev 2020;49:8790-839.
7. Schon TB, McAllister BT, Li PF, Seferos DS. The rise of organic electrode materials for energy storage. Chem Soc Rev 2016;45:6345-404.
8. Chen Y, Kang Y, Zhao Y, et al. A review of lithium-ion battery safety concerns: the issues, strategies, and testing standards. J Energy Chem 2021;59:83-99.
9. Liu B, Jia Y, Yuan C, et al. Safety issues and mechanisms of lithium-ion battery cell upon mechanical abusive loading: a review. Energy Stor Mater 2020;24:85-112.
10. Chao D, Zhou W, Xie F, et al. Roadmap for advanced aqueous batteries: from design of materials to applications. Sci Adv 2020;6:eaba4098.
11. Fang G, Zhou J, Pan A, Liang S. Recent advances in aqueous zinc-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett 2018;3:2480-501.
12. Huang S, Zhu J, Tian J, Niu Z. Recent progress in the electrolytes of aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Chemistry 2019;25:14480-94.
13. Park JH, Park SH, Joung D, Kim C. Sustainable biopolymeric hydrogel interphase for dendrite-free aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Chem Eng J 2022;433:133532.
14. Ma L, Chen S, Li N, et al. Hydrogen-free and dendrite-free all-solid-state zn-ion batteries. Adv Mater 2020;32:e1908121.
15. Li B, Zhang X, Wang T, et al. Interfacial engineering strategy for high-performance Zn metal anodes. Nanomicro Lett 2021;14:6.
16. Xie C, Li Y, Wang Q, Sun D, Tang Y, Wang H. Issues and solutions toward zinc anode in aqueous zinc-ion batteries: a mini review. Carbon Energy 2020;2:540-60.
17. Hao J, Long J, Li B, et al. Toward high-performance hybrid Zn-based batteries via deeply understanding their mechanism and using electrolyte additive. Adv Funct Mater 2019;29:1903605.
18. Ming J, Cao Z, Wu Y, et al. New insight on the role of electrolyte additives in rechargeable lithium ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett 2019;4:2613-22.
19. Fang T, Liu Q, Hu A, Meng J, Fu Y, Shi Z. Dendrite-free and stable zinc-ion batteries enabled by a cation-anion synergistic regulation additive. J Power Sources 2023;581:233521.
20. Bayaguud A, Luo X, Fu Y, Zhu C. Cationic surfactant-type electrolyte additive enables three-dimensional dendrite-free zinc anode for stable zinc-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett 2020;5:3012-20.
21. Sun T, Zheng S, Du H, Tao Z. Synergistic effect of cation and anion for low-temperature aqueous zinc-ion battery. Nanomicro Lett 2021;13:204.
22. Chen P, Zhang K, Tang D, et al. Recent progress in electrolytes for Zn-air batteries. Front Chem 2020;8:372.
23. Lin MH, Huang CJ, Cheng PH, Cheng JH, Wang CC. Revealing the effect of polyethylenimine on zinc metal anodes in alkaline electrolyte solution for zinc-air batteries: mechanism studies of dendrite suppression and corrosion inhibition. J Mater Chem A 2020;8:20637-49.
24. Chen CY, Matsumoto K, Kubota K, Hagiwara R, Xu Q. A room-temperature molten hydrate electrolyte for rechargeable zinc-air batteries. Adv Energy Mater 2019;9:1900196.
25. Kapaev RR, Ohayon A, Sonoo M, Tzadikov J, Shalom M, Noked M. Structure-performance relations for carbons in Zn-air battery cathodes with non-alkaline electrolytes. Electrochim Acta 2023;456:142462.
26. Wu WF, Yan X, Zhan Y. Recent progress of electrolytes and electrocatalysts in neutral aqueous zinc-air batteries. Chem Eng J 2023;451:138608.
27. Wang C, Li J, Zhou Z, et al. Rechargeable zinc-air batteries with neutral electrolytes: recent advances, challenges, and prospects. EnergyChem 2021;3:100055.
28. Wang K, Pei P, Wang Y, Liao C, Wang W, Huang S. Advanced rechargeable zinc-air battery with parameter optimization. Appl Energy 2018;225:848-56.
29. Sun W, Küpers V, Wang F, Bieker P, Winter M. A non-alkaline electrolyte for electrically rechargeable zinc-air batteries with long-term operation stability in ambient air. Angew Chem Int Ed 2022;61:e202207353.
30. Liu Z, Wang R, Gao Y, et al. Low-cost multi-function electrolyte additive enabling highly stable interfacial chemical environment for highly reversible aqueous zinc ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater 2023;33:2308463.
31. Ghavami RK, Rafiei Z, Tabatabaei SM. Effects of cationic CTAB and anionic SDBS surfactants on the performance of Zn-MnO2 alkaline batteries. J Power Sources 2007;164:934-46.
32. Chang C, Hu S, Li T, et al. A robust gradient solid electrolyte interphase enables fast Zn dissolution and deposition dynamics. Energy Environ Sci 2024;17:680-94.
33. Wan S, Song K, Chen J, et al. Reductive competition effect-derived solid electrolyte interphase with evenly scattered inorganics enabling ultrahigh rate and long-life span sodium metal batteries. J Am Chem Soc 2023;145:21661-71.
34. Gou Q, Luo H, Zhang Q, et al. Electrolyte regulation of bio-inspired zincophilic additive toward high-performance dendrite-free aqueous zinc-ion batteries. Small 2023;19:e2207502.
35. Zhi L, Li T, Liu X, Yuan Z, Li X. Functional complexed zincate ions enable dendrite-free long cycle alkaline zinc-based flow batteries. Nano Energy 2022;102:107697.
36. Zhou W, Chen M, Tian Q, Chen J, Xu X, Wong C. Cotton-derived cellulose film as a dendrite-inhibiting separator to stabilize the zinc metal anode of aqueous zinc ion batteries. Energy Stor Mater 2022;44:57-65.
37. Zhang D, Cao J, Chanajaree R, et al. Reconstructing the anode interface and solvation shell for reversible zinc anodes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2023;15:11940-8.
Cite This Article
Export citation file: BibTeX | RIS
OAE Style
Fang T, Wu M, Lu F, Zhou Z, Fu Y, Shi Z. Dendrite-free Zn anodes enabled by interface engineering for non-alkaline Zn-air and Zn-ion batteries. Energy Mater 2024;4:400039. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/energymater.2023.139
AMA Style
Fang T, Wu M, Lu F, Zhou Z, Fu Y, Shi Z. Dendrite-free Zn anodes enabled by interface engineering for non-alkaline Zn-air and Zn-ion batteries. Energy Materials. 2024; 4(4): 400039. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/energymater.2023.139
Chicago/Turabian Style
Fang, Tao, Mengxue Wu, Feiyu Lu, Zhengyi Zhou, Yanpeng Fu, Zhicong Shi. 2024. "Dendrite-free Zn anodes enabled by interface engineering for non-alkaline Zn-air and Zn-ion batteries" Energy Materials. 4, no.4: 400039. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/energymater.2023.139
ACS Style
Fang, T.; Wu M.; Lu F.; Zhou Z.; Fu Y.; Shi Z. Dendrite-free Zn anodes enabled by interface engineering for non-alkaline Zn-air and Zn-ion batteries. Energy Mater. 2024, 4, 400039. http://dx.doi.org/10.20517/energymater.2023.139
About This Article
Special Issue
Copyright
Data & Comments
Data
0
Cite This Article 1 clicks
Like This Article 2
likes
Comments
Comments must be written in English. Spam, offensive content, impersonation, and private information will not be permitted. If any comment is reported and identified as inappropriate content by OAE staff, the comment will be removed without notice. If you have any queries or need any help, please contact us at support@oaepublish.com.